A range, not a verdict
The headline result is the full healthy weight range for your height, because there is no single correct weight for a given height. The visual band shows how wide that range actually is.
See the healthy weight range for your height alongside four classic clinical estimates — Devine, Robinson, Miller and Hamwi — with frame-size adjustment, metric and imperial units, and a plain explanation of what each number does and does not mean.
The classic formulas were published with separate male and female constants.
Only used to place a marker on the range. Leave it blank if you prefer.
Hamwi adjusts by 10% for frame size. Measure your wrist to check which you are.
The green band is the weight range that corresponds to a BMI of 18.5 to 24.9 at your height.
| Formula | Year | Result | Also |
|---|
These formulas were designed in the 1960s to 1980s for medication dosing and actuarial tables, not as personal goals. They ignore muscle mass, bone density, body composition, ethnicity and health history, and they disagree with each other by several kilograms at the same height. Treat the healthy range as the meaningful output and the single numbers as historical reference points. For advice about your own weight, speak to a doctor or a registered dietitian.
Most pages give you one number and imply it is a target. A range, four formulas and an honest explanation of their limits is more useful and more accurate.
The headline result is the full healthy weight range for your height, because there is no single correct weight for a given height. The visual band shows how wide that range actually is.
Devine, Robinson, Miller and Hamwi all disagree. Seeing them side by side makes the spread obvious instead of hiding it behind one confident-looking figure.
Hamwi adds or subtracts 10% for small and large frames. Most calculators skip this entirely, which is why their numbers feel wrong for broad or slight builds.
Every result is shown in kilograms and pounds at the same time, so you never have to convert or switch tabs to compare with a chart you were given elsewhere.
Age-appropriate handling for under-18s, a clear note on what these formulas were built for, and no pretence that a 1974 dosing equation knows your body composition.
Height, weight and age never leave your device. The calculation runs in your browser, nothing is stored, and there is no account to create.
Four inputs, and only two of them are required.
Switch between centimetres and kilograms or feet, inches and pounds. Results always appear in both regardless of what you pick.
These two drive every formula. Height is by far the strongest input, which is why the same weight range applies to very different bodies.
Wrap your thumb and middle finger around the opposite wrist. Overlapping suggests a small frame, just touching medium, not meeting large.
Look at the green band before the individual numbers. If your current weight sits inside it, the individual formulas are not telling you anything useful.
Ideal body weight equations still have real, specific jobs outside of personal goal setting.
Devine and Robinson are still used to calculate drug doses and ventilator tidal volumes from height.
Seeing BMI translated back into a weight range in kilograms makes the number far easier to interpret.
Rowing, martial arts and weight-class sports reference height-to-weight tables when placing athletes.
Arriving with your own numbers makes the conversation with a clinician quicker and more specific.
If two charts disagree, this shows you why: they are using different equations from different decades.
Students comparing IBW equations can read all four constants and results in one place.
Every classic ideal body weight formula follows the same shape: a base weight for a person five feet tall, plus a fixed amount for each additional inch of height. They differ only in those two constants, and they were each fitted to a different population for a different purpose. That is why four respected equations can produce answers that differ by five kilograms or more for the same person.
The more current approach skips the fixed constants entirely. Multiply the square of your height in metres by 18.5 and by 24.9, and you get the weight range the World Health Organization classifies as healthy for adults. At 175 cm that is roughly 56.7 kg to 76.3 kg. Because it is a range rather than a point, it acknowledges what the older equations do not: two healthy adults of the same height can legitimately differ by twenty kilograms.
If you want to explore the surrounding numbers, our BMI calculator includes a waist-to-height ratio, the body fat calculator uses the US Navy circumference method, and the macro calculator covers daily energy and macronutrient reference values.
The questions people ask most about height-to-weight numbers.
There is no single ideal weight for a height. The most useful answer is a range: the weights that correspond to a BMI of 18.5 to 24.9 at your height. Enter your height above and the calculator shows that range in both kilograms and pounds, along with what four older clinical formulas would each estimate.
None of them is accurate in the way people expect, because they only use height and sex. Devine is the most widely used in clinical settings, mostly because drug dosing conventions were built around it rather than because it predicts health outcomes better. For general purposes the healthy BMI range is a more defensible answer than any single formula.
Each was fitted to a different dataset for a different purpose between 1964 and 1983, so their base weights and per-inch increments differ. Miller produces a flatter curve than Hamwi, for example, so the gap between them widens the taller you are. The spread is genuine information: it shows how imprecise the whole concept is.
Wrap your thumb and middle finger around the opposite wrist. If they overlap, that suggests a small frame; if they just touch, medium; if they do not meet, large. It is a rough proxy for skeletal width, and only the Hamwi formula in this calculator adjusts for it, by 10% in each direction.
No. These formulas are validated for adults only. Children and adolescents are assessed with age-and-sex-specific percentile growth charts, because normal weight changes constantly through development. If you enter an age under 18 the calculator tells you this rather than showing an adult result.
Because neither BMI nor the IBW formulas can distinguish muscle from fat. Muscle is denser, so a well-trained athlete at a healthy body fat percentage frequently lands above the range. This is a known limitation, not an error, and it is one reason clinicians pair BMI with waist measurement or body composition testing.
The formulas themselves do not use age for adults, and the healthy BMI range is the same at 25 as at 65. Body composition does shift with age, and some research suggests a slightly higher BMI is not harmful in older adults, but no widely adopted equation encodes that. Age is collected here only to flag when the adult formulas should not be used.
No. Every calculation happens in your browser using JavaScript. Your height, weight and age are never transmitted or stored, and the page keeps working if you go offline after it loads.
Check your healthy weight range and see how four classic formulas compare, with the context that explains why they disagree. Free, instant and entirely private.
General information only, not medical advice. Nothing you enter is uploaded, stored or shared.